Posted on: 30-06-07 22:52:26
Quote:
Originally posted by shankaracharya
That is exactly the point. If his 41 centuries did not win tournaments for India then what is the use of those centuries. As they say it is not how long you lived but what you accomplished in those years.
Do we have an option ?.
By that logic even Brian lara is not a great batsman ...... going by that logic then India has not had a cricketers other than Kapil who is a great player......as for accomplishment ..... well his record says it all .... cricket is a team sport and needs input from all players.....
Quote:
Originally posted by shankaracharya
But History will show that both Tendulya and Gavaskar were not great as they were supposed to be.
People will Grow up but you need to change your Logic. These two or anu other Batsman, can not win you Tournaments. Batsman can give you Matches here & there but not everytime. We remember Kapil as Great Achiever. You see the reason?
I am not a Great Fan of Sachin - but he should be praised when he deserves. And again, Don't look for Hero. Cricket is a Team Game. And Understand the Game - Bowlers will give you Cups.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mumbai Maazi Ladki ...
Quote:
Originally posted by shankaracharya
Tiger Woods or even our own Vishwanathan Anand.
These two don't play Team Sports. Sachin would have won a lot - but he is in Team Game.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mumbai Maazi Ladki ...
