The whole conundrum can be solved and understood if one understands that a country’s progress and prosperity depends on its leaders. The world history is proof of that. Take for example, USA under Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Bush junior and Obama. USA’s progress and prosperity had wild swings under different leaders – Same country, same people, same infrastructure but wildly different result in terms of prosperity. You can also study China under Mao and Deng zao ping, Russia under Gorbachev and Putin, Germany under Hitler and post Hitler, England under Churchill and post Churchill. Hope you guys get a message here. Whatever may be your arguments about progress and employment prospects in India, please remember that those prospects are not because of MMS but in spite of MMS. It is said that the civilizations do not die they commit suicide. Indian scenario is no different. Under MMS, they are on path of suicide.

does not matter whether it is MMS or Sonia/Rahul. The ultimate result would be same. India cannot prosper under moron and corrupt leaders. India desperately requires Narendra Modi but when the country is bent on committing suicide, the discussion about job prospects and GDP and false propsperity built on foreign money is useless. Indian trade deficit is so huge that if the foreign financial institutions pull out the rug from under the feet, India would fall in crevice in a flash.