At the time of accident did u ask the cop why u were chosen at fault..
I am amazed the cop found u at fault..
Accident when both sides of traffic are taking Left turn are the hardest to judge.. I think the cop choosing u at fault without a 3rd party witness must have been ur greatest benefit of doubt..
Quote:
Originally posted by coolvip
Thank you for the comments, they are like icing on the cake.
As mentioned in the very first line, the charge was related to left turn violation and not jumping red light.
Called insurance company...they did not already raise the rates because if the case is pending it does not show up in driving history so no increase in premium because of ticket.
I gained following:
1) Saved fine
2) Maintained clean driving record otherwise 3 points are already high. This is biggest gain.
3) The premium will not go up because there is no fine, no points.
4) Able to share the experience that would potentially help other drivers. Many a times very safe drivers get tickets due to various unavoidable circumstances. I would say they sometime make small mistake instead of committing actual offence such as speeding or intentionally jumping lights, DUI, etc. If studied right it could maintain clean record and could save money from insurance companies.
One more q - there was a collision , a cop ticketed you .. case went to court and the charge withdrawn .... No increase in premium as there is no conviction .
BUT what happens to the claim made by either party with Insurance company for damages ?? How do the insurance company determine who is at fault and in which party's history shall reflect 'at-fault' collision ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Quote:
Originally posted by dudewheresmycar
At the time of accident did u ask the cop why u were chosen at fault..
I am amazed the cop found u at fault..
Accident when both sides of traffic are taking Left turn are the hardest to judge.. I think the cop choosing u at fault without a 3rd party witness must have been ur greatest benefit of doubt..
sometimes, it is really difficult to determine who is at fault in case of collision and to clear some mis conception this http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900668_e.htm would be a good read.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pramod Chopra
Senior Mortgage Consultant
Mortgage Alliance Company of Canada
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
BUT what happens to the claim made by either party with Insurance company for damages ?? How do the insurance company determine who is at fault and in which party's history shall reflect 'at-fault' collision ?
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
BUT what happens to the claim made by either party with Insurance company for damages ?? How do the insurance company determine who is at fault and in which party's history shall reflect 'at-fault' collision ?
Quote:
Originally posted by coolvip
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
BUT what happens to the claim made by either party with Insurance company for damages ?? How do the insurance company determine who is at fault and in which party's history shall reflect 'at-fault' collision ?
Very good question Fido. The insurance company already put me at fault (accident was in Feb ticket got withdrawn in Dec). From billing department they confirmed about no raise in premium because no ticket/points but to change the status on claim she directed me to talk to claims advisor..I left couple of messages for her. Hard to get hold of her..she did not even talk to me when the repair was getting done. But insurance works differently. So lets see how it goes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Advertise Contact Us Privacy Policy and Terms of Usage FAQ Canadian Desi © 2001 Marg eSolutions Site designed, developed and maintained by Marg eSolutions Inc. |