Things we may have to face as a part of this community.
Jump to Page:
< Previous [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] Next >
This is somehow turning into a huge "sex ed" debate thread and I'm not sure why. The original context if I understand correctly was that kids were discussing this topic between themselves (not part of the curriculum) and asked a teacher, who correctly responded that in Canada "Men are allowed to marry men and same for women". Based on this, the OP approached the teacher and asked them to "avoid" the topic.
I'm curious, what would everybody who disagrees with the teacher's response like them to do? How do you "avoid" this topic if kids are discussing it already, knowing that suppressing it in the class would likely trigger more curiosity about it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Quote:
Originally posted by Full House
Quote:
Originally posted by Aashu
----------
Hello Aashu,
I found a nice article, being a little too long, I will provide here just the link to it.
Here is the link to the article. :
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/when-it-comes-to-sex-ed-the-kids-arent-all-right/article1241718/?page=all
Hope this will throw some light on it and we get to see the advancements that are looming in the horizon. Good or bad, I will accept it. As time progresses, all the countries will adapt to it. I don't mind being in a country that is tops in this subject matter.
FH.
Full house: Thanks for the informative article. Some important points in the article:
a) “Kids know way more than most people give them credit for,” says Ms. Frost, 33. “I think some parents feel control is being taken from them, but I also think some parents are a bit outdated on how quickly children are maturing these days.”
b) "Advocates say sex education is not introducing young children to sexuality, but simply contextualizing information to which most already have been exposed."
c) “We need to have those conversations by age 11 or 12,” Dr. Saewyc says. “If you want to hear explicit, listen in to the conversations in the schoolyard and online. There isn't anything explicit or shocking in the curriculum.”
Most importantly, "When children get comprehensive sexual-health education from an early age, they are more likely to postpone the higher-risk activities." -- Lyba Spring, Toronto Public Health
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posted on: 19-06-14 15:42:36
Quote:
Originally posted by Rajagopal
“I think some parents feel control is being taken from them, but I also think some parents are a bit outdated on how quickly children are maturing these days.”
Along with parents being outdated, there are parents who bury their head in the sand and think everybody's thinking and living like them, or ride the moral high horse by tossing the "culture" card, or remain plain ignorant and suffer situational unawareness.
Meanwhile, kids are learning and...learning more.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dimple2001
deleted
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posted on: 19-06-14 16:30:42
Quote:
Originally posted by Aashu
I know you mean in general ...
Sorry, should have clarified. Yes, you are correct, I meant it in general and not towards you.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dimple2001
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
This is somehow turning into a huge "sex ed" debate thread and I'm not sure why. The original context if I understand correctly was that kids were discussing this topic between themselves (not part of the curriculum) and asked a teacher, who correctly responded that in Canada "Men are allowed to marry men and same for women". Based on this, the OP approached the teacher and asked them to "avoid" the topic.
I'm curious, what would everybody who disagrees with the teacher's response like them to do? How do you "avoid" this topic if kids are discussing it already, knowing that suppressing it in the class would likely trigger more curiosity about it?
Agree.
It was supposed to be about same-sex couples, nothing discussed about what they do in their private life. A very logical and legal response is expected from the care giver.
I am sure, those in denial will come around to accept the facts sooner than later. Accepting the fact does not necessarily mean endorsing or promoting it, just acknowledging that such cases exists.
Hiren
Few points here:
1. The 5yr olds were already "exposed" to this kind of thing - since they were discussing the topic
2. It was not teacher/caregiver initiated
3. The caregiver "replied to their query" in a way which would encourage a broad acceptance - in line with the culture of this country
4. The caregiver used age appropriate language and provided the correct amount if information.
5. There was no sex education here
We are quick to censure - it is how we are brought up....
The "greatness" of our culture could not hold you - and you came here - our community is so perfect and so morally superior that 5/6 yr olds google Sunny Leone - who is a star thanks to the wonderful people - kids dance on public platforms with vulgar crotch movements and expressions while their parents proudly clap and cheer.... Kids from good families use language which we would not be able to listen - the list is endless... Our community is the best
Don't go through life with your head in the sand... The landscape is changing.... Kids will learn... As they should - it is part of growing.... It is normal.... To steer them in the right direction rather than hide and control is the right approach.... The caregiver did just that.... Satisfy the curiosity in a manner which is matter of fact...
There are many kids who grow up with split personalities - one for their cultured and old fashioned parents "good boy" - and the other - in tune with their Canadian friends.
We are all parents - and we are all in the same boat.... Be a part or be apart
