Quote:
Originally posted by elmer fudd
Quote:
Originally posted by DELHI INDIAN
Anyways, I still remember his batting on one day matches. OMG he was really slow. He was really funny (playing one day as test match).
Especially when he was batting on 49* and needing a run to reach the half century mark. It was like the beginning of every "Mahabharath" episode. "Main samay hoon" --rotating chakra, suspension of time and space, birth of the universe and Shastri still needing a single for reaching his milestone. Repeat same story at 99*.
Should non-performance by the other 10 players be justification for retaining Sachin. Should he not set an example like Viv Richards or Steve Waugh and other greats, by winning matches for the team on his own. Every time the team chases, it is only a matter of time before we see Tendulkar returning with bat under his arm pit, with the team score not even one fourth of the chase and he would have got out in an absurd way. It only shows he did not have the concentration or the willingness and is resting on the oars of his past performance. Most of the time, it is left to the rookies to win or lose the game. Then we will have the all-time-great generously participating in the victory celebrations. For all the greatness attributed to him, can't he show some grit and determination to remain at the crease at least for 25 overs.
One of the reasons for the non-performance of the team is the malaise of most of the players not fighting for their places on the field by their performance, but through the media. We have "dedicated" media people start shouting from the roof top, any time a particular player who have their blessings (or is the other way around) gets dropped. It was not this much before the onset of cricket as entertainment through satellite channels. Similarly, even a single match winning performance gets trumpeted all over the sport page, we are afraid that we have missed out handing over the Bharat Ratna to him. Right from the next match, the player's performance become pedestrian and we have the media people "covering" his non-performance. Great players like Vengsarkar, Mohinder, Vishy and others were dropped when the time came to hang their boots.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
Should non-performance by the other 10 players be justification for retaining Sachin.
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
Should he not set an example like Viv Richards or Steve Waugh and other greats, by winning matches for the team on his own.
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
Every time the team chases, it is only a matter of time before we see Tendulkar returning with bat under his arm pit, with the team score not even one fourth of the chase and he would have got out in an absurd way. It only shows he did not have the concentration or the willingness and is resting on the oars of his past performance.
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
One of the reasons for the non-performance of the team is the malaise of most of the players not fighting for their places on the field by their performance, but through the media.
We have "dedicated" media people start shouting from the roof top, any time a particular player who have their blessings (or is the other way around) gets dropped. It was not this much before the onset of cricket as entertainment through satellite channels. Similarly, even a single match winning performance gets trumpeted all over the sport page, we are afraid that we have missed out handing over the Bharat Ratna to him. Right from the next match, the player's performance become pedestrian and we have the media people "covering" his non-performance. Great players like Vengsarkar, Mohinder, Vishy and others were dropped when the time came to hang their boots.
bhootnath,
I am with you completely.
Tell me who's been benefitting all along with Sachin's high scores. Yes, all the runs go into his records, but indirectly into India's kity as well. When he scores big and India wins matches, noone complains (there are numerous matches statistically). But when he falters, everyone take their eyes/mind off him. He SURELY IS the match winner.
Someone please find some official statistics then let's talk. Until then, a so-called bad phase doesn't matter. At least to me.
There's no great in Cricket at this time, except the only one - Sachin.
Quote:
Originally posted by seenimesh
Cricketnext Article Link : http://cricketnext.in.com/news/think-before-critising-tendulkar/63864-13.html
Few lines from the article
For heaven's sake, someone should remind these self-proclaimed critics that Tendulkar is a human and not a run machine. Before criticising him, these pundits should remember one simple thing - name a better player than him to play cricket beside Sir Don Bradman or maybe Sir Vivian Richards.
LARA
"Beneath the helmet, under that unruly curly hair, inside the cranium, there is something we don't know, something beyond scientific measure.
quick to praise, quick to blame\" attitude and shortsightedness of some of the critics and so called cricket experts.
What is the point in going on supporting for Sachin, if ultimately we want India to win (i.e., if we really believe it is the national team). Have we not enough of this sort of idol worship in the field of politics, where the idol worship of Nehru, making one family having a stranglehold on the nation and the major political party, taking both of them down the drain during the last 60 years. We can see a similar parallel in cricket also during the last 25 years.
For all the record books waved on our face, Sachin or any other batsman is only as good as the last delivery he faced. Once upon a time Gavaskar or Kapil also possessed similar records. But can it be a reason for keeping them in the team for ever.
If we are really unbiased for the cause of our team, we can never accept the way Sachin gets out most of the time these days. Deliveries bowled on the stumps, which he earlier used to drive straight down for four, he attempts to play across towards mid-wicket or square leg. May be his reflexes have become slow or may be he thinks why he should keep running up and down so many times (especially when the team is chasing) or may be he thinks there is no selector who will dare to drop him. Standing plumb in front of the wicket for LBW, it is pathetic to see the all time great turn his back on the umpire, hoping that the decision goes in his favour. How many more times are we to keep seeing that on our TV screens. There is a difference between batsman getting out and throwing his wicket away. If it is latter case, he should be punished, even if he is the greatest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
What is the point in going on supporting for Sachin, if ultimately we want India to win (i.e., if we really believe it is the national team). Have we not enough of this sort of idol worship in the field of politics, where the idol worship of Nehru, making one family having a stranglehold on the nation and the major political party, taking both of them down the drain during the last 60 years. We can see a similar parallel in cricket also during the last 25 years.
For all the record books waved on our face, Sachin or any other batsman is only as good as the last delivery he faced. Once upon a time Gavaskar or Kapil also possessed similar records. But can it be a reason for keeping them in the team for ever.
Advertise Contact Us Privacy Policy and Terms of Usage FAQ Canadian Desi © 2001 Marg eSolutions Site designed, developed and maintained by Marg eSolutions Inc. |