Arvind Kejriwal slapped again while campaigning in Delhi....
Jump to Page:
< Previous [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ]
Posted on: 15-05-14 14:13:03
Quote:
Originally posted by RBO
what is point?
The point is the answer to the claims that no riots took place after 2002 under Modi's watch.
I know your next comment would be, "who cares!".
Quote:
Originally posted by febpreet
Quote:
Originally posted by RBO
The point is the answer to the claims that no riots took place after 2002 under Modi's watch.
I know your next comment would be, "who cares!".
You really have trouble understanding, don't you? I said "largely peaceful".
You're scaling new heights of naivety if you think that it is possible to completely quell violence in India. Maybe that's what Kejriwal told you, but it is not possible. Violence and death through riots and other means would've happened all over India during this time. Heck, there were even a number of mass shootings in the US. Your point has no point.
Applying your absurd logic, if riots during Modi's rule in Gujarat makes him a murderer, the rape of the Danish tourist in Delhi during Kejriwal's CM time must make him a rapist. Any robberies would make him a thief and bribery make him corrupt. But wait, there were no robbery or bribery in Delhi during those 49 days, right?
And given how you've interpreted things so far, I must clarify here that I'm not calling Kejriwal these things, just showing the sheer insanity of your logic.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Point is not what Modi did , Point is what Modi chose not to do and that was ; not doing visibly enough to curb the violence. He may not be the first hand murderer but he was leader who failed to stop the madness and never accepted responsibility.
Same as Sajjan kumar instigated violence and may not have killed anybody himself. Modi contributed towards slowness of govt machinery at dire time with a vested motive. He is ex-RSS.
When ship is damaged a good captain will take a bow and will not stick to the position.
Quote:
Originally posted by dhaikin
Quote:
Originally posted by RBO
The report concluded that the train was attacked by thousands of Muslims from the Signal Falia area.[
regards
Do you want any further proof.
So, stop talking this secularism bullshit.
There are fanatic elements in the society, which have to learn to behave. Or else they have to be taught their lesson in the language they understand.
Its not revenge, Its just to ensure that no one (no one) ever dares to think of repeating Godhra. And I believe they still haven't learned because riots are still happening in so called secular govt areas..
Ab ki baar - Modi Sarkar
Aur baar baar - Modi Sarkar
Hmmm..So you mentioned muslims saying there are Fanatic Elements in the society who should learn to behave or else lesson should be taught. May be you are right.
Lets talk about 1984 ......
How do you think we should ensure that fanatic element who acted during 84 should not lift their head again ? I am sure you will not answer to that because you or a close one of you might be the fanatic element of 84.
...and in 1992 some fanatic elements did some damage to psych of normal Indians, what should be done to them ?
Actually muslims like you or hindu or sikh like you are all same. Modi has a hint of you and that is the point being made here.
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
Quote:
Originally posted by febpreet
Quote:
Originally posted by RBO
The point is the answer to the claims that no riots took place after 2002 under Modi's watch.
I know your next comment would be, "who cares!".
You really have trouble understanding, don't you? I said "largely peaceful".
You're scaling new heights of naivety if you think that it is possible to completely quell violence in India. Maybe that's what Kejriwal told you, but it is not possible. Violence and death through riots and other means would've happened all over India during this time. Heck, there were even a number of mass shootings in the US. Your point has no point.
Applying your absurd logic, if riots during Modi's rule in Gujarat makes him a murderer, the rape of the Danish tourist in Delhi during Kejriwal's CM time must make him a rapist. Any robberies would make him a thief and bribery make him corrupt. But wait, there were no robbery or bribery in Delhi during those 49 days, right?
And given how you've interpreted things so far, I must clarify here that I'm not calling Kejriwal these things, just showing the sheer insanity of your logic.
Well BL, I knew you couldn't resist.
My opinions and interpretations are mine and I really don't care a dime of what you label them as.
When you or the other Modi's devout Bhakts shout from the rooftop that no riots take place after 2002 then you need to seriously look at the stats. The claim was about Gujarat and not Delhi, UP, Bombay, or elsewhere. So, in perspective the answer had to be specifically for Gujarat.
You have trouble with my twisted logic, please don't read it. Generally, all Modi Bhakts and Sanghis have a deep seated and often heated issues with anything against Modi. I treat you no different.
The truth is Modi was, is, and will be the most polarizing figure in India.
Now, you will utter the sheer popularity and like someone above quote the election results. Then, I must direct you to the similar German Federal Elections of 1933 where Hitler won the popularity vote - what transpired after is in front of everyone else. So, the mass popularity doesn't mean a darn when you have a blotted and irresponsible past.
When stats after stats show other States such as Maharashtra and Delhi is way ahead of FDI, investments, Human development index, Bhakts are still insisting upon the highly publicized/marketed Development model, but never provide any evidence to the outsiders as to what this very development model is all about. I have never seen a single feature or documentary from an unbiased perspective on Gujarat that substantiate these claims and the ground reality first hand. Buying print and electronic space to drumroll your picture all over doesn't even count.
On Kejriwal, I don't care what you call him - your prerogative. My support for AAP still stands still and will be. By the way, don't you still know that Delhi Police is not under Delhi Govt.? May be, you need to enlighten your ignorant mind, which is full of 'Modi'.
I just don't consider Modi to be more than a Soap and Oil advertisement or a Marketing gimick. What you think about my opinions/interpretations/logic is of no use to me, which I proudly give two hoots about.
Said 'nough!
I just don't consider Modi to be more than a Soap and Oil advertisement or a Marketing gimick.
vahi Modi AK-49 ko oil bhi lagaye ga or Soap se Dho bhi dalega
One more day to go
wait and watch....picture abhi baki hai mere dost....!Quote:
Originally posted by RBO
I just don't consider Modi to be more than a Soap and Oil advertisement or a Marketing gimick.
vahi Modi AK-49 ko oil bhi lagaye ga or Soap se Dho bhi dalega
One more day to go
wait and watch....picture abhi baki hai mere dost....!Why wait and watch when you know the next PM will be Modi - whether is it good or bad, is what being discussed here.
Advertise Contact Us Privacy Policy and Terms of Usage FAQ Canadian Desi © 2001 Marg eSolutions Site designed, developed and maintained by Marg eSolutions Inc. |