POLL : What do you think about below joke
| Poll:POLL : What do you think about below joke | |||
| Choice | Stats | ||
| This joke is fine for CD | 41% (12) |    |
|
| This joke is not acceptable CD content | 59% (17) | |
|
Jump to Page:
< Previous [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ]
| Poll:POLL : What do you think about below joke | |||
| Choice | Stats | ||
| This joke is fine for CD | 41% (12) | |
|
| This joke is not acceptable CD content | 59% (17) | |
|
Posted on: 30-07-15 22:47:17
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
Huh ... Are you referring to Rajcanada or me ..
So what's wrong with suggesting a solution to Canadian Sakhi section or ladies if you are aware of it .... ???
Its not thinking , but trying to help .... Some people do it , others don't !!
I was only referring to the retarded addicts and since you immediately staked your claim for that title, you are knighted as one.
As I said before, you need to read, understand and then post. You posted about your henna stuff on Canadiandesi which is generic. It was not posted under Canadian Sakha as there is no such thing here. Hope you get the difference.
What help you are talking about in Canadiansakhi? You simply provided a random salon name just for the heck of responding. Unless you have used it for your waxing needs or you know some one used their services, that would have been more sensible.
Is Rajcanada not the admin here and is it not admin’s responsibility to review all the posts? And what are you here on Canadiandesi other than being the biggest moron of CD? The way you pick fights with majority of the members here, that should confirm this title as well.
For me, you are the biggest joke on CD and instead the voting should be on this issue.
Quote:
Originally posted by gktaurus
I was only referring to the retarded addicts and since you immediately staked your claim for that title, you are knighted as one.
ROFL
Too much!-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Quote:
Originally posted by rajcanada
Adult jokes and even suggestive ones do not really gel with what CD was created for. Problem with adult jokes and sometimes even other jokes is where do we draw the line. How do you develop a marking scheme or grading for jokes to say this has crossed the line and this has not?
Good points.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
So here's where we stand as of now on the people who've expressed their opinion on the thread. I've not counted people who've decided to abstain. If I've missed your vote or placed incorrectly, let me know.
Anonymous poll is 52 (not ok) to 48 (ok) currently. The problem with this one is unless you look at it through the backend db, you don't know how many active members voted or how many new aliases were created to vote. Hopefully that's not the case and I'll check that part later, but this is also the reason why I had originally encouraged a reply on the thread. Looks like the vast majority have done that, thanks for posting your opinions regardless of what you've voted!
NOT OK
BlueLobster
SudeSingh
Tamilkuravan
GeetaKhanna
JRF
Hchheda
RBO
GKTaurus
MCG7
OK
San-Hugo
Blue_Peafowl
Full House
northyork_desi
seenimesh
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Well put, but apparently, there are places where rules are made on "popularity".
Quote:
Originally posted by geetakhanna
For what it is worth.....
My response is a clear 2 - not ok on CD
There really seem to be just a handful of ayes - and ardent lovers of the jokes - why don't you make a whatsapp group and post there? These jokes would be in the right place with the right audience.
The gist of the matter seems to be that the jokes are beginning to become more crude and crass with each post. This reaction by some members - is called drawing a line. This joke is the one straw that broke the camel's back.
If you were defending something noble - it would have been different - defending "vulgarity" (for lack of a better word) in the name of popularity - shows character and priorities. When there is clearly a mixed audience to the site - these jokes are not on the correct platform.
Does not mean that there is anything wrong with the jokes or that they are not good or the choicest of the lot - it just means that this is not the correct forum to post these jokes. We all love naughty jokes but we do not come to this forum to seek them.
Vagg's jokes are nice - but he must exercise judgment prior posting a joke. Waah waahi by a few does not make right a wrong.
We all know there are strip clubs. A stripper performing there is fine. Would you think it right if the stripper performed a strip show at an Indian wedding? Why not? She is very good - people like her - best dancer - gorgeous woman - men love her.
The above is an extereme example - but I have mentioned stripper in keeping with the flavour of Vagg's jokes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Quote:
Originally posted by northyork_desi
I am OK with this kind of jokes (I already did the poll option ).
If admins are out to moderates jokes, it should be applied to all jokes including Santa Banta ones. For any site/forums, the moderators make the rules. So if this is your decision, go for it. Frankly, I didnt understand this Vagg joke the first few times I read it.
I think this is a valid point. There have been protests against this in the past, maybe its time to disallow this too. Hopefully this puts to rest the stupid notion that I've got some agenda against "Vagg's jokes".
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Completely agree, Hiren.
And you're absolutely right, its nothing to do with a specific poster, all about the content.
Quote:
Originally posted by hchheda
I am with BL on this one. The issue is not what we can accept as adults, it is about what we want to see on this site. Jokes with an inferred reference to adult content is the line I would draw. Direct mention of genitals and poking fun at them is not funny IMO and straight into crude category.
Also I feel that BL is not targeting 1 poster but at the content and using that content as a example to demonstrate where the line is crossed. It should also be noted that this content has NOT been created by the poster to be a direct blow to his/her credibility, it has only been passed on from 1 source to another.
Beyond that is it the wish of the poster if he/she wants to overstep that fine line or stay within it.
I also don't agree that the moderators should step in and delete those. They are letting us be adults and practice self censorship.
I vote NOT OK to explicit content.
Hiren
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Advertise Contact Us Privacy Policy and Terms of Usage FAQ Canadian Desi © 2001 Marg eSolutions Site designed, developed and maintained by Marg eSolutions Inc. |